By Rose Hoban
Often legislative committee hearings are sleepy affairs, attended by lawmakers, lobbyists and the occasional person interested in the intricacies of government.
That was not the case Tuesday on the sixth floor of the legislative office building. The size and excitement of the crowd looked more like someone had a small stash of Taylor Swift tickets or the hottest new iPhone for sale.
Lobbyists and advocates of expanding the state’s Medicaid program were jammed into a hallway, hoping to get inside the room where something, after more than a decade of waiting, might start to happen.
State House committees were set to discuss House Bill 76, Access to Healthcare Options, which could create a pathway for hundreds of thousands of low-income North Carolinians to receive health coverage. The potential recipients are largely low-income workers who earn too much to qualify for the program as it is currently structured. But if North Carolina pulled down federal dollars that other states do, they could qualify and be added to the Medicaid rolls.
The program, as is, mostly covers children from families with low incomes, some of their parents, some people with disabilities and seniors with limited financial means. For many low-income workers, health insurance can be out of reach because they earn too little to qualify for subsidies available through the federal health insurance online marketplace.
Rep. Donny Lambeth, the Republican from Winston-Salem who is the primary sponsor of the bill, said it’s time for North Carolina to get off the list of 12 states that have not adopted Medicaid expansion. The issue has been a political flashpoint in North Carolina since the Republican-led General Assembly voted in 2013 to reject the portion of President Barack Obama’s hallmark Affordable Care Act that makes expansion possible.
“North Carolina would become the 39th state,” Lambeth told the House Health Committee Tuesday morning. “We’ve learned from other states, we had hearings in this room that brought in a number of other states.”
Lambeth argued that since North Carolina moved the Medicaid program to a managed care regimen in 2021, it has resulted in more budget predictability and efficiency than when Medicaid was operated as a fee-for-service program.
“We have a good system now,” Lambeth said. “It’s been working for a while.”
After just 18 minutes, with little discussion, the bill passed the health committee with only a handful of opposing votes. A similar scene unfolded in a House finance committee in the afternoon, where the entire discussion took less than 15 minutes, with no opposing votes.
Medicaid expansion — after a 10-year wait — seems to be breezing through the state House of Representatives.
The biggest challenge now will be getting the Senate on board.
No work requirement
Lambeth and another primary sponsor Rep. Donna White (R-Clayton) have been at the forefront of other Republican-generated bills to expand Medicaid in the 2017, 2019 and 2021 sessions. There’s a noticeable difference in the latest rendition, which drew broad interest in the committee meetings on Tuesday — there is no proposed work requirement for new program beneficiaries.
That had been a caveat that most Republican-led states tried to enact in conjunction with expansion programs. But federal judges have generally blocked states from creating work requirements for Medicaid, but one Georgia judge ruled that the Biden administration’s rejection of that state’s work requirement plan was an overreach, clearing the way for Georgia to enact such a requirement.
The federal legislation that created Medicaid in 1965 defines the program as an entitlement, open to everyone who falls in the coverage category.
During the Trump administration, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services moved to approve states’ requests for adding work requirements, but the Biden administration has generally frowned on such efforts.
Advocates have long argued that most of the people who would gain Medicaid coverage under expansion are already working. They have held up people like child care workers, farmers, ministers and others who earn lower wages in companies and jobs that don’t provide health benefits as the primary beneficiaries. The bill would include people earning up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, which translates to $19,391 for an individual or $33,064 for a family of three.
“Most of these people who will qualify are actually working,” Lambeth said. “They just can’t afford health care.”
For others who are not working, House Bill 76 requires the state Department of Commerce to collaborate with the state Department of Health and Human Services to “create a seamless, statewide, comprehensive workforce development program,” that will be known as NC Health Works.
“I bet you hear that every day in your district that people, employers, small businesses can’t get enough workers,” Lambeth said. “We do need to figure out the magic behind helping individuals who actually would qualify for this program, potentially improve theirselves.”
The initiative put forward by Lambeth duplicates the strategy taken by Montana when it expanded Medicaid. Lambeth said members of a North Carolina Medicaid study committee that met last year “really liked” that model. The Montana program helped match its new Medicaid recipients who were unemployed with job training and employment opportunities. That excluded students, caregivers, disabled people or beneficiaries in drug treatment programs.
In Montana, about 13,000 people participated in that state’s job program, and 72 percent got a job once they finished employment training, according to a report generated by the Montana Department of Labor and Industry. Health care professions accounted for seven of the top 10 jobs that people in the training program pursued, according to one finding.
Hospitals give, get
One stumbling block over the past decade for expansion was the question of who would pick up the tab for the additional recipients. The Affordable Care Act stipulates that the federal government would pick up 90 percent of the cost for the new beneficiaries, while states need to cover the other 10 percent.
Estimates for the North Carolina portion of the coverage range from $224 million in the first year to about $700 million by the fourth year.
One section of House Bill 76 would change the way hospitals get paid by the federal government for caring for Medicaid patients. The legislation would use the federal Healthcare Access and Stabilization Program, which is administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and reimburses hospitals at a rate closer to the actual cost of care. State health officials say the program would bump up reimbursement for hospitals across the state by about $3 billion per year, but in exchange for North Carolina enacting the program, hospitals would foot the bill for the extra beneficiaries.
Hospitals have long complained that they were already footing the bill for uninsured patients who showed up at their doors. Many hospital representatives say the health care facilities are now willing to pick up the state’s share — as long as the stabilization program is enacted.
“In 2021, Novant Health provided over $727 million in unpaid Medicare coverage and over $111 million in Medicaid coverage to patients,” a Novant Health spokesperson said in an email to NC Health News. “We support the passing of the Healthcare Access and Stabilization Program (HASP) to ensure hospitals have the financial fortitude to care for Medicaid patients.”
‘Counting on you’
Among health care lobbyists and advocates, the excitement over the House bill was palpable. Many advocates wore red for Valentines Day, accessorizing their outfits with stickers picturing a large red heart and reading, “Love thy neighbor. Expand Medicaid!”
Abby Emanuelson, head of Care4Carolina said that while the bill only received about a half hour’s worth of discussion — total — in the two hearings, the day’s outcome was the result of “numerous years” of work and “lots of Zoom minutes.”
“Coalitions have been talking to these members, really getting a lot of good conversations going and, of course, as we heard from Rep. Lambeth today, he’s been talking to his colleagues for a number of years as well about this,” Emanuelson said.
For the past decade, the North Carolina Chamber of Commerce has declined to take a position on Medicaid expansion, but this year a number of other politically conservative and business-friendly groups have endorsed the policy, Emanuelson noted. She said that includes local chambers of commerce from metro areas and rural counties, and multiple boards of county commissioners.
Erica Palmer Smith, who preceded Emanuelson at Care4Carolina, pointed out that other states that have expanded have seen economic benefit.
“Studies have shown that states increase jobs whenever they pass Medicaid expansion,” said Palmer Smith, who now leads the advocacy group NC Child. “Louisiana saw an additional 18,000 jobs, Colorado saw an additional 30,000 jobs.
“I think this is going to be a tremendous benefit for all of those local economies, for their small businesses, for the employees themselves,” Palmer Smith added.
The biggest challenge to enacting House Bill 76 lies on the other side of the legislative building. While the Senate overwhelmingly passed Medicaid expansion last year, their bill included measures to overhaul the state’s laws limiting hospital competition and also included measures to loosen restrictions on advanced practice nurses, such as nurse practitioners and nurse anesthetists. That bill never received a hearing in the House.
“The title is ‘Access to Care,’ yet it doesn’t do anything to increase access in terms of facilities or personnel,” Senate leader Phil Berger told reporters last week about this year’s bill. “It’s not the bill we need in North Carolina expanding Medicaid.”
Lambeth said it was a coincidence that Tuesday’s committee votes occurred on Valentine’s Day. Nonetheless, he shared with his colleagues a holiday rhyme sent to him by a constituent.
“‘Roses are red, violets are blue, our neighbors need affordable health care, and that’s counting on you,’” Lambeth read. “That pretty much says it all.”
Correction: This story initially noted that federal judges consistently blocked states’ efforts to add work requirements to Medicaid. However, a federal judge in Georgia ruled last August that the Biden administration’s rejection of a waiver plan in that state was an overreach. The administration declined to appeal the judge’s decision, clearing the way for Georgia to add a work requirement.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Please do not state that Medicaid covers people with disabilities. It covers a very small set of disabilities like blindness and deafness and it should be stated this way because the list is so short listing out the conditions for clarity wouldn’t take much text/copy. For pretty much anything else you have to be SSI level disabled approved and awarded by the court (at least a months long process). That is an extremely high bar and an atypical feature of NC Medicaid. This misunderstanding erroneously leads people to believe that persons who meet the income limits with serious illnesses can currently be covered by Medicaid and that is not the case.
Thanks for reaching out.
I have added the word “some” ahead of the statement “people with disabilities” in recognition of your comment. You have a point and we try to be as accurate as possible. But if we were to delineate all of the people eligible for Medicaid, we’ve be writing a long paragraph indeed. We do our best to give an accurate sense of complicated topics in the tersest possible language, but this almost always means that stories about Medicaid are longer than most readers will endure because it’s such a complex program!